WEKO3
アイテム
質的研究における合議プロセスの展開
https://ic.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000133
https://ic.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/200013313090b63-0657-4d1b-9087-f381466d7c43
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
2-14_Sakurai.pdf (587 KB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2026-02-02 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 質的研究における合議プロセスの展開 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Development of the Consensus Process in Qualitative Research | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 質的研究 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 合議 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | 研究の質向上 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | qualitative research | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | consensus | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | enhancement of research quality | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
櫻井, 由美子
× 櫻井, 由美子
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This study examined the consensus process as a strategy for enhancing the quality of qualitative research in psychology; particularly, this study focused on its practical potential in relation to key evaluation criteria such as trustworthiness, validation, methodological integrity, and reflexivity. The Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) was introduced to illustrate the application of consensus, and its significance was discussed. A tentative framework was also presented, outlining how consensus can be incorporated at various stages of research. These findings suggest that consensus can be effectively utilized throughout the research process—from planning to publication—through dialogue among researchers, auditors, and participants. However, some issues remain, including the need for a detailed examination of obstacles to consensus, practical burdens of implementation, and concerns about procedural formalization. Future efforts should focus on investigating the consensus process and developing strategies to enhance its quality. Additionally, if consensus is incorporated in the research process, engaging in the reflective consideration of its significance is essential. |
|||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 茨城キリスト教大学紀要 II.社会・自然科学 en : Journal of Ibaraki Christian University II. Social and Natural Sciences 巻 59, p. 289-298, 発行日 2025 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 茨城キリスト教大学 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | Ibaraki Christian University | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1342-6370 | |||||||||||
